Moore RH - Search Results

1

Screening mammography: effect of national guidelines on current physician practice.

Slanetz PJ, Moore RH, Hulka CA, Halpern EF, Habunek DA, Whitman GJ, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Kopans DB. Slanetz PJ, et al. Among authors: moore rh. Radiology. 1997 May;203(2):335-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114084. Radiology. 1997. PMID: 9114084

2

Detecting nonpalpable recurrent breast cancer: the role of routine mammographic screening of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstructions.

Lee JM, Georgian-Smith D, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, Rafferty EA, Moore RH, Yeh ED, D'Alessandro HA, Hitt RA, Kopans DB. Lee JM, et al. Among authors: moore rh. Radiology. 2008 Aug;248(2):398-405. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482071635. Epub 2008 Jun 6. Radiology. 2008. PMID: 18539887

3

Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review.

Moy L, Slanetz PJ, Moore R, Satija S, Yeh ED, McCarthy KA, Hall D, Staffa M, Rafferty EA, Halpern E, Kopans DB. Moy L, et al. Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):176-81. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2251010999. Radiology. 2002. PMID: 12355002

4

Long-term risk of false-positive screening results and subsequent biopsy as a function of mammography use.

Blanchard K, Colbert JA, Kopans DB, Moore R, Halpern EF, Hughes KS, Smith BL, Tanabe KK, Michaelson JS. Blanchard K, et al. Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):335-42. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2402050107. Radiology. 2006. PMID: 16864665

5

Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years.

Kopans DB, Moore RH, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Hulka CA, Whitman GJ, Slanetz PJ, Halpern EF. Kopans DB, et al. Among authors: moore rh. Radiology. 1996 Aug;200(2):357-60. doi: 10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685325. Radiology. 1996. PMID: 8685325

6

Physicians' opinions on the delivery of mammographic screening services: immediate interpretation versus double reading.

Slanetz PJ, Moore RH, Hulka CA, Halpern EF, Habunek D, Whitman GJ, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Kopans DB. Slanetz PJ, et al. Among authors: moore rh. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Aug;167(2):377-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.2.8686608. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996. PMID: 8686608

7

Should women with implants or a history of treatment for breast cancer be excluded from mammography screening programs?

Kopans DB, Moore RH, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Hulka CA, Whitman GJ, Slanetz PJ, Halpern EF. Kopans DB, et al. Among authors: moore rh. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Jan;168(1):29-31. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.1.8976914. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997. PMID: 8976914

8

Previous breast biopsy for benign disease rarely complicates or alters interpretation on screening mammography.

Slanetz PJ, Giardino AA, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Halpern EF, Moore RH, Kopans DB. Slanetz PJ, et al. Among authors: moore rh. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jun;170(6):1539-41. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.6.9609170. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998. PMID: 9609170

9

The sternalis muscle: an unusual normal finding seen on mammography.

Bradley FM, Hoover HC Jr, Hulka CA, Whitman GJ, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Moore R, Kopans DB. Bradley FM, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Jan;166(1):33-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571900. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996. PMID: 8571900

10

Patients' opinion of mammography screening services: immediate results versus delayed results due to interpretation by two observers.

Hulka CA, Slanetz PJ, Halpern EF, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, Moore R, Boutin S, Kopans DB. Hulka CA, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Apr;168(4):1085-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.4.9124120. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997. PMID: 9124120

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

388 results

Search Page

Filters