Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

100 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Breast Density.
Stout NK, Miglioretti DL, Su YR, Lee CI, Abraham L, Alagoz O, de Koning HJ, Hampton JM, Henderson L, Lowry KP, Mandelblatt JS, Onega T, Schechter CB, Sprague BL, Stein S, Trentham-Dietz A, van Ravesteyn NT, Wernli KJ, Kerlikowske K, Tosteson ANA. Stout NK, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Oct 1;184(10):1222-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.4224. JAMA Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 39186304
The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model.
Fryback DG, Stout NK, Rosenberg MA, Trentham-Dietz A, Kuruchittham V, Remington PL. Fryback DG, et al. Among authors: stout nk. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2006;(36):37-47. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgj007. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2006. PMID: 17032893
Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.
Tosteson AN, Stout NK, Fryback DG, Acharyya S, Herman BA, Hannah LG, Pisano ED; DMIST Investigators. Tosteson AN, et al. Among authors: stout nk. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 1;148(1):1-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18166758 Free PMC article.
Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.
Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, Berry DA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G, Huang H, Lee SJ, Munsell M, Plevritis SK, Ravdin P, Schechter CB, Sigal B, Stoto MA, Stout NK, van Ravesteyn NT, Venier J, Zelen M, Feuer EJ; Breast Cancer Working Group of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network. Mandelblatt JS, et al. Among authors: stout nk. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):738-47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00010. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19920274 Free PMC article.
Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.
van Ravesteyn NT, Miglioretti DL, Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Buist DS, Huang H, Heijnsdijk EA, Trentham-Dietz A, Alagoz O, Near AM, Kerlikowske K, Nelson HD, Mandelblatt JS, de Koning HJ. van Ravesteyn NT, et al. Among authors: stout nk. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):609-17. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22547470 Free PMC article.
Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Kerlikowske K, Alagoz O, Berry D, Buist DS, Cevik M, Chisholm G, de Koning HJ, Huang H, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Munsell MF, Trentham-Dietz A, van Ravesteyn NT, Tosteson AN, Mandelblatt JS. Stout NK, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 28;106(6):dju092. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju092. Print 2014 Jun. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014. PMID: 24872543 Free PMC article.
100 results