Distal pulse palpation: is it reliable?

World J Surg. 1999 Mar;23(3):252-5. doi: 10.1007/pl00013177.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of distal pulse palpation. The dorsalis pedis and the tibialis posterior arteries of 25 patients with suspected lower limb arterial disease were independently palpated by three vascular surgeons and three medical students in the outpatient clinic and by two vascular nurses and one physician in the vascular laboratory. The palpation findings were compared to the ankle/brachial index (ABI). Palpable and unpalpable pulses were best separated with ABI 0.76 as the cutoff point. The degree of misdiagnosis was unacceptably high, with an underdiagnosis of more than 30%. The agreement was highest (kappa 0. 68, good) among the vascular laboratory personnel in the peaceful vascular laboratory and lowest (kappa 0.38, fair) among the vascular surgeons in the busy outpatient clinic. The poor agreement and the high proportion of misdiagnosis obtained in the outpatient clinic argue against the use of pulse palpation as a single diagnostic method. Palpable pulses with low ABIs clearly state the need for more objective measurements whenever ischemia is suspected. Yet, by carefully palpating both pedal arteries under good, nonhurried conditions the reproducibility and accuracy of pulse palpation can be tolerable.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Blood Pressure / physiology
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Diagnostic Errors
  • Female
  • Foot / blood supply
  • Humans
  • Leg / blood supply
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Palpation / methods*
  • Peripheral Vascular Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Peripheral Vascular Diseases / physiopathology
  • Pulse / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Systole