The efficacy, safety and tolerability of antidepressants in late life depression: a meta-analysis

J Affect Disord. 1997 Dec;46(3):191-217. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00107-9.

Abstract

Background: To determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of antidepressants in depressed elderly patients.

Methods: Search for randomized controlled double-blind studies evaluating atypical antidepressants (ATYPs), reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase-A, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants in moderate/severe depressed patients > or = 60 years for > or = four weeks. The random effects model (single-arm; comparative) was used to aggregate efficacy, safety and dropout.

Results: No difference in single-arm aggregation of outcomes for four antidepressant classes. Comparative analyses showed no statistical difference between outcomes, except SSRIs had a higher response rate than ATYPs.

Conclusion: Elderly show no differences in antidepressant class outcomes.

Limitations: Heterogeneity and lack of power.

Clinical relevance: There is little advantage for antidepressant classes over another in the aged.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Antidepressive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation / therapeutic use
  • Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic / therapeutic use
  • Depressive Disorder / drug therapy*
  • Depressive Disorder / psychology
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Humans
  • Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Patient Dropouts
  • Placebos
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antidepressive Agents
  • Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation
  • Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic
  • Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors
  • Placebos
  • Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors