In the present study, the actions of several compounds with different intrinsic activities and BDZ receptor selectivity were examined in two well established animal models of anxiety: the open field test (OFT) and Vogel's punished drinking text (VT). Full agonists at the BDZ GABAA receptor (midazolam and diazepam) showed anxiolytic-like effects in both tests; however, the doses necessary to disinhibit animal behavior controlled by fear were higher in the VT than in the OFT. None of the partial BDZ receptor agonists studied (bretazenil, Ro 19-8022 and abecarnil) diminished neophobia-like behavior of rats in the OFT, and their sedative influence on gross behavior prevailed. On the other hand, all three drugs produced a clear-cut anxiolytic effect in the VT. A selective BDZ, receptor subtype full agonist (zolpidem) had a similar profile of action to that of partial agonists with an even stronger sedative effect in the OFT. Alpidem (a selective BDZ1 receptor partial agonist) did not reveal any anxiolytic action in either test. Flumazenil (an antagonist at the BDZ-GABAA receptors) also produced no effect in the OFT, or the VT. An inverse BDZ receptor agonist, beta-carboline-3-carboxylate methyl ester (beta-CCM), evoked an anxiogenic-like response in the OFT, but not in the VT. In summary, it appeared that partial agonists and selective ligands at BDZ1 receptors revealed less advantageous anxiolytic-like action than did full allosteric GABAA receptor modulators. This study also indicates the test dependent profiles of action of BDZ-GABAA receptor ligands. It also indirectly suggests a different neurobiological background underlying the applied tests.