Objective: A new long-acting injectable form of bromocriptine has become available for long-term treatment of hyperprolactinaemic patients. The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and tolerability of injectable and oral forms of bromocriptine.
Design: A double-blind randomized study. All patients received either one injection of bromocriptine 50 mg intramuscularly and placebo tablets for 28 days (Group A) or one placebo injection and oral bromocriptine 7.5 mg daily for 28 days (Group B).
Patients: Twenty-three (12 patients for Group A and 11 patients for Group B) hyperprolactinaemia patients with (19 patients) or without (4 patients) CT/MRI evidence of tumour were studied.
Measurements: Plasma PRL levels and serum bromocriptine levels were assessed during a follow-up of 42 days. MRI and/or CT were evaluated before and 28 days after the beginning of the study.
Results: All patients had significant reductions of PRL levels from 1000 h and 1100 h of day 1 to 2000 h of day 35. Normoprolactinaemia was shown in eight patients of Group A and six of Group B on days 1-28. Normal PRL levels were still present in five patients of Group A and in one patient of Group B on day 35; only three patients of Group A had normoprolactinaemia on day 42. A significantly greater decrease in Group A in comparison with Group B was shown at 1200 h on day 1 and at all times as a percentage decrease from basal levels. Significantly higher levels of bromocriptine were shown in Group A at all timepoints studied. No difference was shown in tolerability and incidence of side-effects.
Conclusion: Our data show that injectable bromocriptine more frequently induced a prolonged normoprolactinaemia than did the oral drug. Moreover, bromocriptine levels released during injectable bromocriptine were significantly higher than during oral bromocriptine. On the other hand no difference was shown in the tolerability of bromocriptine according to the route of administration.