Emergency physicians' experiences with defensive medicine and their motives for acting defensively - an interview study

Acute Med. 2024;23(3):132-139. doi: 10.52964/AMJA.0988.

Abstract

Background: Defensive medicine (DM) has been increasingly studied in recent years. This study aims to investigate the understanding of DM and the motives for practicing DM among emergency physicians.

Methods: Focus group interviews.

Results: Themes identified: The understanding of DM, DM is a matter of self-confidence, DM or tests to ensure diagnosis and patient flow, DM due to confounding by availability, DM due to guidelines, Patient-initiated DM, Fear of complaints, DM in an emergency department setting.

Conclusion: This study shows that emergency physicians perform an abundance of diagnostic tests and investigations but only categorize few of them as DM. The many flow-mediating tests based on guidelines may, however, mask activities that individual physicians would possibly find defensive, if it was up to them to decide based on pure and simple anamnesis and clinical findings. It might be argued that flow optimization has overruled medical clinical reasoning in some ways, thereby introducing an inclination to conduct DM.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Defensive Medicine*
  • Emergency Medicine*
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Female
  • Focus Groups*
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Motivation*
  • Physicians / psychology
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / statistics & numerical data
  • Qualitative Research