Knowledge gaps in diagnosing chronic polyneuropathy: Review of national guidelines

Abstract

The prevalence of chronic polyneuropathy will increase due to the aging population, and therefore, it becomes ever so important to optimize the diagnostic process. However, it is uncertain which blood tests are required and when nerve conduction studies (NCS) should be done in the workup of chronic polyneuropathy. We aimed to investigate the methodology used to develop national polyneuropathy guidelines and to provide an overview and strength of evidence of the recommendations. We searched PubMed and websites of national neurological associations as listed on the website of the World Federation of Neurology to identify national guidelines pertaining to the workup of chronic polyneuropathy by neurologists in an outpatient clinic setting. We identified three national guidelines in the United States and seven national guidelines in Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Turkey. The methodology used to develop the guidelines differed greatly. All guidelines recommend a series of blood tests. Some guidelines advise to conduct NCS in all patients, while other guidelines advise to conduct NCS when certain symptoms are present. There is variation in recommendations about the extensiveness of NCS, but all mention measuring the sural nerve and the motor peroneal nerve. The evidence for the recommendations is graded as low. Despite some overlap, there are disparities between guidelines regarding the workup that is advised to do in patients with chronic polyneuropathy. It remains unclear which combination of blood tests are to be strongly recommended. Furthermore, it is undetermined whether NCS are always necessary.

Keywords: diagnostics; guidelines; polyneuropathy.