Clinical Implications of Pretest Probability of HFpEF on Outcomes in Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension

Abstract

Background: Patients with group 1 pulmonary hypertension (PH) and risk factors for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) demonstrate worse response to pulmonary vasodilator therapy. The mechanisms and optimal diagnostic approach to identify such patients remain unclear.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare exercise capacity, cardiac function, and hemodynamic responses to provocative maneuvers among patients with group 1 PH based upon pretest probability of HFpEF.

Methods: Pretest probability for HFpEF was determined using the validated HFpEF-ABA algorithm based on age, body mass index, and history of atrial fibrillation among group 1 PH patients recruited to the multicenter PVDOMICS (Redefining Pulmonary Hypertension through Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics) study. Functional capacity, quality of life, and dynamic pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) responses were compared between those with low (<25%), intermediate (25%-74%), and high (≥75%) ABA score-based HFpEF probability.

Results: Among 424 patients with group 1 PH, 54% (n = 228) had intermediate HFpEF probability and 15% (n = 64) had high HFpEF probability. Resting PCWP increased progressively with higher HFpEF probability (P < 0.0001), and patients with group 1 PH and high HFpEF probability had the greatest increases in PCWP with nitric oxide, fluid challenge, and exercise (P < 0.001 for all), changes that were comparable to patients with HFpEF with no pulmonary vascular disease (n = 194), but lower than those with HFpEF and combined precapillary and postcapillary PH. Left ventricular/atrial size, diastolic function, quality of life, 6-minute walk distance, and peak VO₂ were most abnormal in patients with group 1 PH and high HFpEF probability compared with those with low or intermediate HFpEF probability (P < 0.0001 for all). Increasing HFpEF probability in group 1 PH was associated with greater risk of death (HR per decile of HFpEF probability 1.09; 95% CI: 1.05-1.13; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Quantifying pretest probability for HFpEF in patients with group 1 PH identifies a subset of patients with worse dynamic PCWP response indicative of subclinical left heart disease, with poorer functional status, quality of life, and survival. Further study in this group 1 PH subgroup is indicated to determine whether PH therapies are effective and safe, and also whether HFpEF-specific therapies can improve functional status and outcomes.

Keywords: HFpEF; exercise hemodynamics; pulmonary arterial hypertension.