A dynamically loaded ex vivo model to study neocartilage and integration in human cartilage repair

Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Sep 30:12:1449015. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1449015. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Articular cartilage injuries in the knee can lead to post-traumatic osteoarthritis if untreated, causing debilitating problems later in life. Standard surgical treatments fail to ensure long lasting repair of damaged cartilage, often resulting in fibrotic tissue. While there is a vast amount of research into cartilage regeneration, integrating engineered implants with cartilage remains a challenge. As cartilage is a load bearing tissue, it is imperative to evaluate tissue repair strategies and their ability to integrate under mechanical loading. This work established a dynamically loaded ex vivo model of cartilage repair using human cartilage explants. The model was used to assess the efficacy of a stem cell therapy delivered in a bioadhesive hydrogel comprised of photocrosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) and microbial transglutaminase to repair the model defect. Extensive neocartilage production and integration were observed via histology and immunohistochemistry after 28 days chondrogenic culture. Analysis of culture media allowed monitoring of glycosaminoglycan and type II collagen production over time. A mechanical assessment of integration via a push out test showed a 15-fold increase in push out strength over the culture duration. The model was successful in exhibiting robust chondrogenesis with transglutaminase or without, and under both culture conditions. The work also highlights several limitations of ex vivo models and challenges of working with bioreactors that must be overcome to increase their utility. This ex vivo model has the potential to delay the need for costly pre-clinical studies and provide a more nuanced assessment of cartilage repair strategies than is possible in vivo.

Keywords: bioadhesive; bioreactor; cartilage; chondrogenesis; dynamic loading; hydrogels; integration; mechanical stimulation.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was carried out with support from The Victorian Medical Research Acceleration Fund (2018-Round 2), the Melbourne Medical School seeding grant, the St Vincent’s Hospital (Melbourne) Research Endowment Fund, the Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation Clinical Investigator award, an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship, and an NHMRC-Medical Research Future Fund (App No. 1193897) Investigator Grant.