Introduction: Communication with families is essential to improve satisfaction, especially in the critical care setting. We sought to identify patients who were not recovering as expected and to improve communication with their families.Methods: We implemented a novel algorithm, incorporating clinical and social criteria, to determine which patients could benefit from additional communication. Patients who qualified were randomized to the intervention of a structured interdisciplinary family meeting or to standard communication in the Intensive Care Unit at the discretion of the attending. Surveys were administered to both groups to determine the primary outcome of satisfaction with communication. Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square, or Fisher's exact test as appropriate was used to compare baseline characteristics and survey items between groups.Results: There was no difference between the intervention (n = 25) and non-intervention groups (n = 33) in demographic or clinical characteristics (P-value >.05). Surveys were able to be completed for 76% of the intervention group and 51% in the non-intervention group. There was no difference in the responses to the survey between the groups (P-value >.05), signifying that families were satisfied with communication regardless of whether they had a structured interdisciplinary family meeting.Conclusion: Our results are contrary to the traditionally held belief that structured family meetings improve communication. A possible explanation is that implementing an algorithm to identify patients in need of additional communication predisposes providers to be more cognizant of family needs in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit. Future research should focus on qualitative research to elucidate what aspects of communication are most useful to families.
Keywords: communication; critical care; family meetings; palliative care.