Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has shown promising procedural outcomes in high-volume centers. While inferior procedural outcomes were reported in inexperienced centers during the early days of EUS-BD, the current outcomes are unknown. This study aimed to clarify the feasibility and safety of EUS-BD in centers that recently introduced EUS-BD.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted at 22 centers that introduced EUS-BD between 2017 and 2022. A maximum of 20 initial EUS-BD cases at each center were evaluated. The clinical outcomes and experience of 84 endoscopists who performed these procedures were examined. The primary outcomes were the rate of technical success and adverse events (AEs). The secondary outcomes were risk factors associated with technical failure and procedure-related AEs.
Results: A total of 255 patients were enrolled. The technical success rate was 91.4% (233/255). Among technical failure cases (n=22), guidewire manipulation failure was the most common cause (n=12), followed by tract dilation failure (n=5). The AE rate was 10.2% (26/255). Multivariate analysis identified a puncture target diameter of <5 mm (odds ratio, 3.719; 95% confidence interval, 1.415-9.776; p=0.008) and moderate ascites extending to the liver surface (odds ratio, 3.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.195-8.653; p=0.021) as independent risk factors for technical failure and procedure-related AEs, respectively. Endoscopists' procedural experience was not a risk factor for technical failure or procedure-related AEs.
Conclusions: The feasibility and safety of EUS-BD were maintained during the induction phase at inexperienced centers. These will be helpful in better understanding the current status of EUS-BD.
Keywords: EUS-CDS; EUS-GBD; EUS-HGS; EUS-RV; interventional EUS.
Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.