Condyle head fracture management: A systematic review of outcomes

Abstract

The management of Condylar Head fractures (CHFs) has historically been with closed treatments(CTR); however, contemporary studies suggest that Open Reduction and Internal Fixation(ORIF) may produce better clinical and radiographic results. Our primary aim was to review the literature on the clinical and radiological outcomes of open and closed management of CHFs. A systematic literature search was undertaken using EMBASE, MEDLINE and PubMed, using PRISMA guidelines, for all studies relating to outcomes following CHF. The inclusion criteria include 1) studies focused on CHF in adult patients that included at least 20 cases 2) published in English language. ROBINS-1 tool was used for risk assessment. Data extracted was analysed and compared using the relative risks. A total of 29 studies reporting on 1550 ORIF and 798 CTR were included. ORIF resulted in significantly less trismus (RR 9.5), chin deviation (RR 7.3), malocclusion (RR 6.5), TMJ clicking (RR 4.3) and pain(RR 12.6) than CTR. Due to the substantial heterogeneity of studies, firm conclusions are difficult but there does appear to be objective benefits in outcomes following ORIF than CTR. Satisfactory results may however be achieved with CTR. Further large studies using standardised outcome measurements will be required to help elucidate exactly which CHF are best served by ORIF.

Keywords: Condyle head fractures; Indications; Intracapsular condyle fractures; Outcomes; Treatment.