Background & aims: We previously reported in the ELY prospective study that increased resting energy expenditure (REE) - so-called hypermetabolism - worsened tumor response, 6-month progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Here, we investigated the effect of caloric coverage on the sensitivity to ICI.
Methods: We retrospectively analysed a multicentric database of mNSCLC patients treated with ICI. All patients had a baseline nutritional assessment including REE measured with indirect calorimetry and a dietitian estimation of food intakes. Measured/theoretical REE ≥110% defined hypermetabolism. Intakes ≥90% of estimated needs defined caloric coverage. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included response rate and OS.
Results: Among 162 patients, 84 (51.9%) were normometabolic, and 78 (48.1%) hypermetabolic. In hypermetabolic patients, 40 (51.3%) met their caloric needs (group A) while 38 (48.7%) did not (group B). Median PFS was 4.3 vs. 1.9 months in groups A and B, respectively (HR: 0.49, 95%CI [0.31-0.80], p = 0.004). The PFS achieved in the group A and in normometabolic patients were similar (HR: 0.99, 95%CI [0.65-1.51], p = 0.95). In multivariate analysis, caloric coverage was independently associated with improved PFS in hypermetabolic patients (HR: 0.56, 95%CI [0.31-0.99], p = 0.048). Among hypermetabolic patients, the median OS was higher in the group A (HR: 0.58, 95%CI [0.35-0.95], p = 0.03).
Conclusion: Energy supply is a critical determinant of the sensitivity to ICI in NSCLC patients. A randomized study to evaluate the benefit of early nutritional intervention is warranted.
Keywords: Basal metabolism; Immunotherapy; Indirect calorimetry; Lung cancer; Survival.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.