Utilising accessible and reproducible neurological assessments in clinical studies: Insights from use of the Neurological Impairment Scale in the multi-centre COVID-CNS study

Clin Med (Lond). 2024 Sep;24(5):100241. doi: 10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100241. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

Abstract

Reproducible and standardised neurological assessment scales are important in quantifying research outcomes. These scales are often performed by non-neurologists and/or non-clinicians and must be robust, quantifiable, reproducible and comparable to a neurologist's assessment. COVID-CNS is a multi-centre study which utilised the Neurological Impairment Scale (NIS) as a core assessment tool in studying neurological outcomes following COVID-19 infection. We investigated the strengths and weaknesses of the NIS when used by non-neurology clinicians and non-clinicians, and compared performance to a structured neurological examination performed by a neurology clinician. Through our findings, we provide practical advice on how non-clinicians can be readily trained in conducting reproducible and standardised neurological assessments in a multi-centre study, as well as illustrating potential pitfalls of these tools.

Keywords: COVID-19; Clinical study; Neurological assessment; Neurology; Outcome tool.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19* / diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Nervous System Diseases* / diagnosis
  • Neurologic Examination* / methods
  • Neurologic Examination* / standards
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Severity of Illness Index