Prevalence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients at high-risk of failure after CAR T-cell therapy eligible for bridging radiation therapy

Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 19:14:1425506. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1425506. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) meeting high-risk criteria for early relapse after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy (CART) who have disease encompassable in a standard radiation therapy (RT) plan (defined as <5 malignant lesions) and may benefit from bridging RT prior to CD19 CART.

Materials and methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study of patients with R/R NHL who received CD19 CART from 2018 to 2022. Eligible patients had pre-apheresis radiologic studies available. All patients were classified by number of lesions and history of high-risk disease criteria: bulky disease ≥10 cm, ≥1 extranodal (EN) sites, LDH ≥normal, or ≥1 lesion with SUVmax ≥10.

Results: A total of 81 patients with R/R NHL were evaluated. Based on our definition, 40 (49%) patients would have been eligible for bridging RT, including 38 patients who met high-risk criteria: 31 with ≥1 EN site, 19 had ≥1 lesion with SUVmax ≥10, 16 with bulky disease, and 3 with elevated LDH. At 3 months after CART, ORRs in high-risk patients with <5 lesions, ≥5 lesions, and no lesions on pre-apheresis studies were 76% (CR 69%, PR 7%), 70% (CR 60%, PR 10%), and 80% (CR 80%), respectively.

Conclusion: Approximately 47% (38/81) of patients were classified as at high risk of relapse after CART with disease encompassable in a standard radiation plan and eligible for bridging RT studies.

Keywords: CD19 CAR T-cell therapy; bridging radiotherapy; bridging therapy; radiotherapy; relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R NHL).

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding for this study was provided by RefleXion Medical, Inc. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, or the decision to submit it for publication.