Background & aims: Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for fibrosis staging in patients with chronic hepatitis delta (CHD). Here, we comparatively evaluated the performance of transient elastography (TE) and biomarkers for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with CHD.
Methods: A total of 230 HDV-infected RNA-positive patients from various centers who underwent liver biopsy and liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) using Fibroscan, within a period of 6 months maximum, were investigated retrospectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden index were used to establish cutoff values of LSM. TE was compared with other noninvasive tests: aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, Fibrosis-4, and Delta-4 fibrosis scores.
Results: Histologic fibrosis stage distribution was: 20.4% for F0-F1; 27.0% for F2; 18.7% for F3; and 33.9% for F4. TE demonstrated good diagnostic performance for detecting cirrhosis and advanced fibrosis with an Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 and 0.86, which were significantly higher than those obtained with the other noninvasive tests (P = .004 and P < .001). With a cutoff value of >12 kPa for cirrhosis, the sensitivity was 70.5%, specificity was 86.2%, positive predictive value was 72.4%, negative predictive value was 85.1%, and accuracy was 80.9%. Using 10.4 kPa as the cutoff value for F3, the sensitivity was 70.2%, specificity was 83.5%, positive predictive value was 82.5%, negative predictive value was 71.7%, and accuracy was 76.5%. In 89% of patients with LSM ≤6.2 kPa, liver biopsy disclosed only absent or minimal fibrosis.
Conclusion: TE demonstrated good diagnostic performance for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with CHD. Advanced fibrosis is highly probable for LSM values ≥10 kPa. LSM values <6 kPa almost totally exclude significant fibrosis. Between 6 and 10 kPa, liver biopsy should be discussed.
Keywords: Chronic Hepatitis D; Cirrhosis; Hepatitis Delta Virus; Noninvasive Tests; Transient Elastography.
Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.