Aims: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is increasingly used in Internal Medicine to complement medical examination, documenting pleural and lung conditions. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of handheld ultrasound device (HHUSD) with high-end ultrasound device (HEUSD) in patients with heart failure or pneumonia, also including the assessment of costs and time-savings.
Methods: In this observational study 72 patients (aged ≥ 18) admitted to Internal Medicine Unit for heart failure or pneumonia underwent LUS plus evaluation of inferior cava vein (ICV) when indicated, using both HHUSD and HEUSD. Each evaluation, independently performed by 2 different experienced operators, included B-lines number, pleural effusion, lung consolidations, ICV ectasia and its respiratory excursions.
Results: Concordance between HHUSD and HEUSD findings was 79.3% ± 17.7 (mean ± SD) for B-lines, 88.6% for pleural effusion, 82.3% for consolidations and 88.7% and 84.9% for ICV ectasia and its respiratory excursions respectively. BMI didn't significantly influence concordance between the two methods. Moreover, examination time (as mean ± SD) was shorter with HHUSD (8 ± 1.5 min) compared to HEUSD (10 ± 2.5 min).
Conclusions: HHUSD demonstrated high accuracy in detecting B-lines, pleural effusions, lung consolidations and ICV evaluation when compared to HEUSD. Thus, HHUSD, not only is characterized by accessibility, portability, and easy handling due to its small size, but it also offers advantages in terms of saving costs and time, ultimately contributing to faster patient assessment compared to HEUSD.
Keywords: Handheld ultrasound device; Heart failure; Lung ultrasound; Pocket-sized ultrasound; Point of care ultrasound; pneumonia.
© 2024. The Author(s).