Determining Risk Factors for Detachment After Endothelial Keratoplasties: Nine-Year Review of a Single Institution

Osamah Mian; Jacob Warmath; Fares Refai; Umar Sandhu; Karan Multani; Anushka Raj; Justin Dvorak; David A Murphy; Kamran M Riaz

doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000003658

Determining Risk Factors for Detachment After Endothelial Keratoplasties: Nine-Year Review of a Single Institution

Cornea. 2024 Jul 30. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003658. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Osamah Mian^{1

2}, Jacob Warmath^{2

3}, Fares Refai¹, Umar Sandhu¹, Karan Multani¹, Anushka Raj¹, Justin Dvorak⁴, David A Murphy², Kamran M Riaz²

Affiliations

¹ College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
² Department of Ophthalmology, Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
³ Department of Ophthalmology, Keesler Medical Center, Keesler Air Force Base, Biloxi, MS; and.
⁴ Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.

PMID: 39079753
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003658

Abstract

Purpose: To determine roles of patient history, donor tissue characteristics, tissue preparation methods, and surgeon technique for graft detachment requiring rebubbling after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) procedures.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of all eyes undergoing first-time DSAEK or DMEK at the study institution between 2013 and 2022. Data were collected regarding recipients' history, donors' medical history, tissue preparation methods, intraoperative details, and postoperative clinical outcomes. Multivariate statistical analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for graft detachment necessitating rebubbling.

Results: Of 1240 eyes meeting inclusion criteria, 746 (60.2%) underwent DSAEK, and 494 (39.8%) underwent DMEK. DSAEK procedures had 12.5% rebubbling rate, whereas DMEK procedures had 18.4% rebubbling rate (P = 0.005). Sub50-DSAEK (<50 μm) grafts had 16.0% rebubble rate, whereas sub100-DSAEK (51-99 μm) and >100 μm DSAEKs had rebubble rate of 9.9% and 9.5%, respectively (P = 0.006). Significant risk factors for DSAEK graft detachment included history of retinal surgery (OR = 2.59), preloaded tissue (OR = 2.70), forceps insertion (OR = 2.33), use of sub50-DSAEK lenticules versus sub100-DSAEK (OR = 2.44) and >100 μm DSAEK (OR = 2.38) lenticules, and donor history of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (OR = 4.18). DMEK risk factors included recipient history of cancer (OR = 2.51) and use of higher SF6 gas concentration (OR = 1.09). Although rebubbled DMEK eyes had comparable refractive outcomes to nonrebubbled eyes (P >0.05), rebubbled DSAEK eyes had worse refractive outcomes at all time points (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Graft detachments in DSAEK and DMEK are influenced by various factors, including donor tissue characteristics, tissue preparation, and surgical technique. Identifying and understanding these factors can potentially improve postoperative outcomes.