A critical prelude to any community odor assessment should be the prioritization of specific chemical odorants that are most responsible for targeted downwind odors. Unfortunately, and historically, this is a step that has often been bypassed or overlooked. However, correct understanding of the specific impactful volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can inform the follow-on sampling, analytical, and remediation strategies that are most appropriate and efficient, based upon the chemistry behind the issue. With this understanding, the techniques and sampling strategies presented herein should be viewed as a qualitative prelude rather than an addendum to a follow-up routine, automated downwind odor monitoring. Downwind odor characteristics can vary depending upon the size of the upwind source, interim topography, and wind conditions. At one extreme, the downwind odor plume from a relatively large source located on a flat open plain and under stable, near-straight line wind conditions can be rather broad, sustained, and predictable. In contrast, the plume from a small point source (e.g., a roof vent stack) located on irregular topography and under rapidly shifting wind conditions can be intermittent and fleeting ("spikes" or "bursts"). These transient odor events can be surprisingly intense and offensive, despite their fleeting occurrence and perception. This work reports on improving and optimizing an environmental sampling strategy for odorant prioritization from such transient downwind odor conditions. This optimization addresses the challenges of (1) sampling of transient odor "spikes" and (2) prioritizing odors/odorants from multiple, closely colocated point sources under transient event conditions. Prioritizing is defined as identifying the key impactful odorants downwind. Grab air sampling protocol refinement has emerged from actual community environmental odor assessment projects. The challenge of assessing transient odor events has been mitigated by utilizing (a) rapid, odor-cued whole-air grab sampling (i.e., activated by and synchronous with the perceived sensory spikes) into metalized fluorinated ethylene polymer (m-FEP) gas sampling bags; (b) immediate transfer from bags onto solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers or sorbent tubes; and (c) maintaining refrigerated storage and shipment conditions between field collection and in-laboratory analysis. Results demonstrated approximately 11-fold increases in target odorant yields for 900 mL air sample capture on sorbent tube transfers from 2 to 3 s "burst" odor event bag captures compared to equivalent direct collections (with sorbent tubes) at the same downwind receptor location but during perceived (stable) odor "lull" periods. An application targeting general odor sampling and point-source differentiation utilizing tracer gases is also presented.
© 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.