Changes of the serum properties and its effect on the endothelial cells restoration in patients with chronic venous disease treated with sulodexide

Abstract

Objective: Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction are important venous changes in patients with chronic venous disease (CVD). The use of the venoactive drugs remains an important treatment modality for patients with CVD, reducing the severity of the CVD-related symptoms and swelling but also reducing inflammation and protecting endothelial cells. In this research, the effects of the serum obtained from patients with CVD before and after sulodexide treatment were evaluated for in vivo and in vitro inflammatory markers and endothelial cell function.

Methods: Inflammatory markers (IL-6, matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP-9], vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [VCAM-1], and von Willebrand factor [vWF]) from the incompetent great saphenous veins (GSVs) and from the systemic venous circulation were studied in 10 patients with CVD (C2s) before and after 2 months of sulodexide (2 × 500 lipasemic units/d) therapy. Serum obtained from the vein blood before and after sulodexide treatment was evaluated for in vitro cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cell function.

Results: The serum collected from lower leg incompetent GSVs had significantly elevated levels of VCAM-1 (+29%, P < .001) compared with the serum from the systemic circulation. Endothelial cells exposed to the serum from the incompetent lower leg veins of the untreated CVD patients demonstrated higher stimulated synthesis of MMP-9 (+17%, P < .01), as well as increased markers of senescence (prolongation of population doubling time, β-galactosidase activity, and expression of p21 and p53 genes). CVD serum-induced senescent endothelial cells had a higher expression of genes regulating IL-6, MMP-9, VCAM-1, and vWF synthesis. The overall proinflammatory effect on endothelial cells by the serum collected from the incompetent GSVs was stronger as compared with the serum from the systemic circulation. Serum collected from the veins after sulodexide treatment caused lower levels of endothelial cell inflammatory markers as well as respective gene expression than serum obtained at the beginning of the study (before sulodexide treatment). Sulodexide application also reduced the inflammatory secretory activity of the senescent endothelial cells. Sulodexide treatment resulted in the decrease of the majority of the studied inflammatory parameters in both lower limb incompetent vein and systemic blood.

Conclusions: In patients with CVD, there are significant differences between circulating inflammatory markers analyzed from the lower leg incompetent GSV segments compared with the systemic circulation, indicating a higher inflammatory condition in CVD. Treatment with sulodexide reduces the proinflammatory and endothelial cell activation properties of the serum from patients with CVD.

Clinical relevance: The study documented the significant proinflammatory human vascular endothelial cell activation when exposed to the serum collected from the varicose veins as compared with the serum from the systemic circulation in patients with chronic venous disease (CVD). The inflammatory marker expression, endothelial dysfunction, and endothelial cell senescence transformation can be successfully controlled and downregulated by patients' exposure to the glycosaminoglycan (sulodexide) treatment. Further studies are needed to confirm if glycosaminoglycan application can prevent further CVD clinical progression due to potential CVD-related pathological processes' modulation and their downregulation.

Keywords: Chronic venous disease; Endothelium; Glycocalyx; Inflammation; Sulodexide; Varicose veins.