How arginine inhibits substrate-binding domain 2 elucidated using molecular dynamics simulations

Abstract

The substrate-binding domain 2 (SBD2) is an important part of the bacterial glutamine (GLN) transporter and mediates binding and delivery of GLN to the transporter translocation subunit. The SBD2 consists of two domains, D1 and D2, that bind GLN in the space between domains in a closed structure. In the absence of ligand, the SBD2 adopts an open conformation with larger space between domains. The GLN binding and closing are essential for the subsequent transport into the cell. Arginine (ARG) can also bind to SBD2 but does not induce closing and inhibits GLN transport. We use atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in explicit solvent to study ARG binding in the presence of the open SBD2 structure and observed reversible binding to the native GLN binding site with similar contacts but no transition to a closed SBD2 state. Absolute binding free energy simulations predict a considerable binding affinity of ARG and GLN to the binding site on the D1 domain. Free energy simulations to induce subsequent closing revealed a strong free energy penalty in case of ARG binding in contrast to GLN binding that favors the closed SBD2 state but still retains a free energy barrier for closing. The simulations allowed the identification of the molecular origin of the closing penalty in case of bound ARG and suggested a mutation of lysine at position 373 to alanine that strongly reduced the penalty and allowed closing even in the presence of bound ARG. The study offers an explanation of the molecular mechanism of how ARG competitively inhibits GLN from binding to SBD2 and from triggering the transition to a closed conformation. The proposed Lys373Ala mutation shows promise as a potential tool to validate whether a conformational mismatch between open SBD2 and the translocator is responsible for preventing ARG uptake to the cell.

Keywords: ABC transporter; binding inhibition; conformation transition; free energy simulations; ligand–receptor binding; molecular simulations; transporter inhibition.