Seeing the Trees From the Forest: Challenges in Subgroup Analysis-Based Guidelines in Oncology

Oncol Rev. 2024 May 24:18:1355256. doi: 10.3389/or.2024.1355256. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

As clinical trials in oncology require substantial efforts, maximizing the insights gained from them by conducting subgroup analyses is often attempted. The goal of these analyses is to identify subgroups of patients who are likely to benefit, as well as the subgroups of patients who are unlikely to benefit from the studied intervention. International guidelines occasionally include or exclude novel medications and technologies for specific subpopulations based on such analyses of pivotal trials without requiring confirmatory trials. This Perspective discusses the importance of providing a complete dataset of clinical information when reporting subgroup analyses and explains why such transparency is key for better clinical interpretation of the results and the appropriate application to clinical care, by providing examples of transparent reporting of clinical studies and examples of incomplete reporting of clinical studies.

Keywords: cancer; clinical outcomes; clinical trial; guidelines; reporting; subanalysis; treatment.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Following a request from the authors, AstraZeneca funded studio graphic support for the adaptation of the figure. The graphic support was provided by Ashfield MedComms (Macclesfield, United Kingdom), under the direction of the corresponding author. AstraZeneca did not initiate the development of this manuscript, nor was it involved in any way in its development.