Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: revascularization strategy according to ischemic territory
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2024 May 28:S1885-5857(24)00163-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2024.05.005.
Online ahead of print.
[Article in
English,
Spanish]
Authors
Ki Hong Choi
1
, Sang Yoon Lee
1
, Taek Kyu Park
1
, Joo Myung Lee
1
, Young Bin Song
1
, Joo-Yong Hahn
1
, Seung-Hyuk Choi
1
, Chul-Min Ahn
2
, Cheol Woong Yu
3
, Ik Hyun Park
4
, Woo Jin Jang
5
, Hyun-Joong Kim
6
, Jang-Whan Bae
7
, Sung Uk Kwon
8
, Hyun-Jong Lee
9
, Wang Soo Lee
10
, Jin-Ok Jeong
11
, Sang-Don Park
12
, Tae-Soo Kang
13
, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
1
, Jeong Hoon Yang
14
Affiliations
- 1 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- 2 Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- 3 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- 4 Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea.
- 5 Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Ehwa Woman's University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- 6 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- 7 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
- 8 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital, University of Inje College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- 9 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
- 10 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- 11 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
- 12 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
- 13 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
- 14 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: jhysmc@gmail.com.
Abstract
Introduction and objectives:
The association of revascularization strategy with clinical outcomes according to the ischemic territory of nonculprit lesion has not been documented in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). This study aimed to compare outcomes between culprit-only and immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to ischemic territory in patients with AMI-CS.
Methods:
A total of 536 patients with AMI-CS and multivessel disease from the SMART-RESCUE registry were categorized according to ischemic territory (nonculprit left main/proximal left anterior descending artery [LM/pLAD] vs culprit LM/pLAD vs no LM/pLAD). The primary outcome was a patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) consisting of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, rehospitalization due to heart failure, or repeat revascularization at 1 year.
Results:
Among the total population, 108 patients had nonculprit LM/pLAD, 228 patients had culprit LM/pLAD, and 200 patients had no LM/pLAD, with the risk of POCE being higher in patients with large ischemic territory lesions (53.6% vs 53.4% vs 39.6%; P = .02). Multivessel PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of POCE compared with culprit-only PCI in patients with nonculprit LM/pLAD (40.7% vs 66.9%; HR, 0.52; 95%CI, 0.29-0.91; P=.02), but not in those with culprit LM/pLAD (P=.46) or no LM/pLAD (P=.47). A significant interaction existed between revascularization strategy and large nonculprit ischemic territory (P=.03).
Conclusions:
Large ischemic territory involvement was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with AMI-CS and multivessel disease. Immediate multivessel PCI might improve clinical outcomes in patients with a large nonculprit ischemic burden.
Keywords:
Acute myocardial infarction; Cardiogenic shock; Enfermedad multivaso; Infarto agudo de miocardio; Intervención coronaria percutánea; Ischemic territory; Multivessel disease; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Shock cardiogénico; Territorio isquémico.
Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.