Targeting the Sweet Spot: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Anterior Versus Posterior Glenohumeral Joint Injections for Adhesive Capsulitis

Hye Chang Rhim; Jason M Schon; Raylin Xu; Sean Schowalter; Jane Ha; Connie Hsu; Michael Andrew; David M Robinson; Adam S Tenforde; Daniel H Daneshvar

doi:10.1097/JSM.0000000000001228

Targeting the Sweet Spot: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Anterior Versus Posterior Glenohumeral Joint Injections for Adhesive Capsulitis

Clin J Sport Med. 2024 May 29. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000001228. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School/Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
² Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
³ Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

PMID: 38810121
DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000001228

Abstract

Objective: To compare clinical outcomes following steroid injections using the anterior and posterior approaches.

Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Setting: Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies.

Patients: Patients with adhesive capsulitis.

Interventions: Glenohumeral steroid injections using either anterior or posterior approach.

Main outcome measures: Pain visual analog scale (VAS) and shoulder range of motion (ROM) at 12 weeks, accuracy, and adverse events. Standardized mean difference (SMD) for VAS and weighted mean difference (WMD) for ROMs.

Results: We identified 6 RCTs and one prospective comparative study with a total of 468 patients. While there was no difference in pain VAS at 12 weeks between the 2 approaches (SMD, -0.86; 95% CI, -1.76 to 0.04), the anterior approach resulted in greater improvements in external rotation (WMD, 8.08; 95% CI, 0.79-15.38) and abduction (WMD, 6.76; 95% CI, 3.05-10.48) compared with the posterior approach. Subgroup analysis with RCTs that utilized steroid injection with hydrodilatation for both approaches demonstrated greater reduction in pain VAS at 12 weeks with the anterior approach (SMD, -0.52; 95% CI, -0.98 to -0.07). Overall, procedures were well tolerated without major complications.

Conclusions: While pain reduction is similar, the anterior approach may be more beneficial in restoring shoulder external rotation and abduction compared with the posterior approach at 12 weeks. Steroid injection combined with hydrodilatation may further improve pain control when performed with the anterior approach at 12 weeks.