Why we should use boundaries for personalised knee arthroplasty and the lack of evidence for unrestricted kinematic alignment
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
.
2024 Aug;32(8):1917-1922.
doi: 10.1002/ksa.12266.
Epub 2024 May 28.
Authors
Pascal-André Vendittoli
1
2
3
,
Gautier Beckers
3
4
,
Vincent Massé
1
2
3
,
Philip Winnock de Grave
3
5
6
,
Muthu Ganapathi
3
7
,
Samuel J MacDessi
8
9
Affiliations
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
2
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Québec, Canada.
3
Personalised Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
4
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
5
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, AZ Delta Hospital, Roeselare, Belgium.
6
European Knee Society, Haacht, Belgium.
7
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor, UK.
8
School of Clinical Medicine, St George Hospital, University of NSW Medicine and Health, Kogarah, Sydney, Australia.
9
Sydney Knee Specialists, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
PMID:
38804654
DOI:
10.1002/ksa.12266
No abstract available
Publication types
Editorial
MeSH terms
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee* / methods
Biomechanical Phenomena
Humans
Knee Joint / surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Osteoarthritis, Knee / surgery
Precision Medicine / methods
Range of Motion, Articular
Grants and funding
None