Treatment-Responsive Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease after Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Prophylaxis: Incidence and Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has emerged as standard of care for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention in adult patients without increasing malignant relapse. We previously defined acute GVHD (aGVHD) treatment response categories as corticosteroid-sensitive (SS), -dependent (SD), or -resistant (SR) based on response to first-line corticosteroids and reported their clinical outcomes following non-PTCy-based prophylaxis. More than one-third of patients developed aGVHD necessitating systemic therapy. Cases were predominantly SR, with a 14% overall incidence of SR aGVHD. The incidence and clinical outcomes of these 3 distinct aGVHD treatment response groups following PTCy-based prophylaxis have not been well described. The objective of this retrospective single-institution cohort study was to assess the incidence and clinical outcomes of SS, SD, and SR aGVHD following HCT with PTCy-based prophylaxis using a prophylactic regimen of PTCy, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). We included 196 consecutive adult and pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic HCT for malignant and non-malignant disorders at the University of Minnesota between 2017 and 2021. Patients received PTCy on days +3 and +4 plus tacrolimus and MMF prophylaxis. Bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell graft sources and related and unrelated donors were included. Recipients received myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. Of the 196 allografts, 54 (28%) developed aGVHD before day +180, with a median time to onset of 50 days (interquartile range, 34 to 71 days). Of those, 32 patients (16% overall) developed maximum grade II-III aGVHD necessitating systemic corticosteroids, with the following response: 13 SS (41%), 10 SD (31%), and 9 SR (28%). The overall incidence of SR aGVHD was 4.6%. Only 12 patients (6%) developed maximum grade III aGVHD, and none had grade IV aGVHD. The 2-year overall survival analyzed from 80 days after initiation of systemic treatment was similar in the SS and SD groups (77 and 75%, respectively), comparable to those without aGVHD (81%), and was lowest in the SR group (20%), with GVHD the primary cause of death. Nonrelapse mortality was highest in the SR group. MN high-risk and higher GVHD grade at onset were risk factors for developing SR aGVHD. Overall, we report a low incidence (16%) of aGVHD requiring systemic corticosteroids with PTCy-based prophylaxis. aGVHD cases were predominantly SS aGVHD, with lower incidences of SD and SR aGVHD. Our findings suggest that PTCy-based prophylaxis reduces the rate of treatment-resistant aGVHD. Patients with SR aGVHD had the worst clinical outcomes and poorest survival. Those with SS and SD aGVHD had similar clinical outcomes, both better than seen with SR aGVHD.

Keywords: Graft-versus-host disease; Hematopoietic cell transplantation; Posttransplant cyclophosphamide; Treatment-dependent; Treatment-resistant; Treatment-sensitive.