Current issues in dose-finding designs: A response to the US Food and Drug Adminstration's Oncology Center of Excellence Project Optimus

Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):267-272. doi: 10.1177/17407745241234652. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

Abstract

With the advent of targeted agents and immunological therapies, the medical research community has become increasingly aware that conventional methods for determining the best dose or schedule of a new agent are inadequate. It has been well established that conventional phase I designs cannot reliably identify safe and effective doses. This problem applies, generally, for cytotoxic agents, radiation therapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapies. To address this, the US Food and Drug Administration's Oncology Center of Excellence initiated Project Optimus, with the goal "to reform the dose optimization and dose selection paradigm in oncology drug development." As a response to Project Optimus, the articles in this special issue of Clinical Trials review recent advances in methods for choosing the dose or schedule of a new agent with an overall objective of informing clinical trialists of these innovative designs. This introductory article briefly reviews problems with conventional methods, the regulatory changes that encourage better dose optimization designs, and provides brief summaries of the articles that follow in this special issue.

Keywords: Dose finding; dose optimization; drug development; phase I; trial design.

Publication types

  • Introductory Journal Article

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents* / administration & dosage
  • Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic / methods
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug*
  • Drug Development / methods
  • Humans
  • Maximum Tolerated Dose
  • Medical Oncology / methods
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Research Design*
  • United States
  • United States Food and Drug Administration*

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents