Exploring the complex pre-adaptations of invasive plants to anthropogenic disturbance: a call for integration of archaeobotanical approaches

Front Plant Sci. 2024 Mar 15:15:1307364. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1307364. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Pre-adaptation to anthropogenic disturbance is broadly considered key for plant invasion success. Nevertheless, empirical evidence remains scarce and fragmentary, given the multifaceted nature of anthropogenic disturbance itself and the complexity of other evolutionary forces shaping the (epi)-genomes of recent native and invasive plant populations. Here, we review and critically revisit the existing theory and empirical evidence in the field of evolutionary ecology and highlight novel integrative research avenues that work at the interface with archaeology to solve open questions. The approaches suggested so far focus on contemporary plant populations, although their genomes have rapidly changed since their initial introduction in response to numerous selective and stochastic forces. We elaborate that a role of pre-adaptation to anthropogenic disturbance in plant invasion success should thus additionally be validated based on the analyses of archaeobotanical remains. Such materials, in the light of detailed knowledge on past human societies could highlight fine-scale differences in the type and timing of past disturbances. We propose a combination of archaeobotanical, ancient DNA and morphometric analyses of plant macro- and microremains to assess past community composition, and species' functional traits to unravel the timing of adaptation processes, their drivers and their long-term consequences for invasive species. Although such methodologies have proven to be feasible for numerous crop plants, they have not been yet applied to wild invasive species, which opens a wide array of insights into their evolution.

Keywords: agropastoralism; anthropogenically induced adaptation to invade (AIAI); archaeobotany; evolution; invasive species; neolithic plant invasion hypothesis (NPIH).

Publication types

  • Review

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Both the research and the OA publication were funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) through the Cluster of Excellence ROOTS, under Germany’s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2150 – 390870439. The funding agency had no role in the design, execution of the experiment nor in the data analysis and manuscript writing. We also acknowledge financial support by Land Schleswig-Holstein within the funding programme Open Access Publikationsfonds.