Last generation fluted modular titanium stem in revision hip arthroplasty: a narrative review of mid- and long-term outcomes

Filippo Randelli; Alberto Fioruzzi; Giacomo Barion; Giulia Volpe; Martino Viganò

doi:10.21037/aoj-23-35

Last generation fluted modular titanium stem in revision hip arthroplasty: a narrative review of mid- and long-term outcomes

Ann Jt. 2024 Jan 18:9:5. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-35. eCollection 2024.

Authors

Filippo Randelli¹, Alberto Fioruzzi¹, Giacomo Barion², Giulia Volpe², Martino Viganò²

Affiliations

¹ Hip Department, Gaetano Pini-CTO Orthopaedic Institute, University of Milan, Milan, MI, Italy.
² Department of Orthopedics and Tramatology, University of Milan, Milan, MI, Italy.

Abstract

Background and objective: Tapered fluted titanium stems (TFTS), were introduced to overcome proximal femur bone defects. They obtain stable fixation even in catastrophic proximal bone loss. Modular ones have the advantage to adjust length, rotation, off-set independently from the distal module. Short-term publications have been showing favorable outcomes burdened by an unacceptably high rate of stem failure. Still, there is a paucity of mid- and long-term reports. This narrative review aims at analyzing recent literature on modular TFTS with at least 5 years of minimum follow-up to gain a better understanding of implant survival, performance, and complications.

Methods: A search of the PubMed database was performed with selected key terms. Results were screened after the application of strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data were subsequently evaluated to obtain an up-to-date overview of the results and complications of TFTS.

Key content and findings: Modular TFTS showed a consistent increase in patient reported outcomes that persists at 10 years and above. Femoral fractures were the most common intraoperative complication. Despite modularity, dislocation still occurs at a variable rate (1.2-12%). With revision for any cause as an endpoint, overall survival approaches 83% after 10 years of follow-up. If femoral revision only is evaluated, excellent survival rates (>95%) have been published. Stem subsidence over 5 mm was reported in less than 5% of patients, only 1 requiring femoral revision. The mean incidence of stem mechanical failure was 3.39%, although most breakages occurred in stems eventually retired from the market.

Conclusions: Satisfactory survival rates were observed, with an acceptable rate of complications. Stem mechanical failure, excluding those stems eventually retired from the market, remains a marginal event. Therefore, the use of modular TFTS in revision surgery is safe and effective even in the long term.

Keywords: Modular stem; revision stem; revision total hip arthroplasty (revision THA); stem fracture; stem survival.

Publication types

Review