A Bibliometric Analysis of the 500 Most Cited Papers in Orthopaedic Oncology

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 Jan 18;8(1):e23.00223. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00223. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.

Abstract

Background: Despite notable progress over time, broad insight into the scientific landscape of orthopaedic oncology is lacking. We conducted a bibliometric analysis of the 500 most cited papers in the field.

Methods: We searched the Science Citation Index Expanded database of the Web of Science Core Collection to find the 500 most cited articles in the field.

Results: Citation count ranged from 81 to 1,808. Articles were published from 1965 to 2018. Over half of all articles were published in the United States (53.6%). The 2000s was the most productive decade with 170 (34%) articles. All articles were written in English and were published across 29 journals. Female participation as first authors significantly increased from the 1960s to the 2010s (0% vs 14.6%, P = 0.0434). Similarly, female involvement as senior authors grew from the 1960s to the 2010s (0% vs 12.2%, P = 0.0607). Primary bone sarcomas were the most cited topic among articles from the 1970s to the 1980s. From studies produced in the 1990s up until the 2010s, reconstruction procedures were the most cited topic.

Conclusion: Trends over the years have resulted in an emphasis on a surgical technique. Notable progress has been made regarding gender diversity, yet disparities still exist.

MeSH terms

  • Bibliometrics
  • Databases, Factual
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Orthopedics*
  • Publications
  • United States
  • Writing