Closing the birth registration gap for Every newborn facility birth: literature review and qualitative research

Masudah Paleker; Dorothy Boggs; Debra Jackson; Louise-Tina Day; Joy E Lawn

doi:10.1080/16549716.2023.2286073

Closing the birth registration gap for Every newborn facility birth: literature review and qualitative research

Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2286073. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2286073. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

Authors

Masudah Paleker^{1

2}, Dorothy Boggs^{1

3}, Debra Jackson^{1

4}, Louise-Tina Day, Joy E Lawn¹

Affiliations

¹ Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
² Western Cape Government: Health, Cape Town, South Africa.
³ International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
⁴ School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.

Abstract

Background: Birth registration is vital to provide legal identity and access to essential services. Worldwide, approximately 166 million children under five years (just under 25%) are unregistered, yet >80% of all births occur in health facilities in most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

Objectives: This study, conducted in association with UNICEF, aims to review facility-based birth registration initiatives, and provide recommendations to close the gap between facility birth and birth registration rates in LMIC.

Methods: A literature review covering published and grey literature was conducted to identify facility-based initiatives to increase birth registration rates. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted by audio-call with six key global stakeholders to identify additional initiatives, and further insights for barriers and enablers to close the gap.

Results: Academic databases and grey literature search yielded 21 studies meeting pre-specified inclusion criteria. Nine barriers preventing birth registration were identified and grouped into three themes: health system, governmental, and societal barriers. Facility-based birth registration initiatives resulted in an increase in birth registration rates. Importantly, health promotion within communities also increased demand for birth registration. In-depth interview respondents provided further detail and supported data found in literature review. Synthesis of the literature and stakeholder interviews noted enablers including inter-sectoral collaboration between health sector and civil registration ministries e.g., placing civil registration offices in health facilities or allowing medical doctors to act as registrars.

Conclusion: Facility-based birth registration initiatives can increase birth registration rates in LMIC. Initiatives need to address both supply and demand side of birth registration to improve facility-based birth registration rates. A multi-sectoral approach within governments, and alignment with multiple stakeholders is vital.

Keywords: CRVS; LMIC; birth registration; facility-based; newborn.

Publication types

Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Birth Rate*
Health Facilities
Health Personnel
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Physicians*
Qualitative Research

Grants and funding

This work was part of a LSHTM MSc study for MP. Time for DB, LTD and JEL was supported by CIFF through a grant to The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.