Current policies on early detection of prostate cancer create overdiagnosis and inequity with minimal benefit
BMJ
.
2023 May 17:381:e071082.
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071082.
Authors
Andrew Vickers
1
,
Frank O'Brien
2
,
Francesco Montorsi
3
,
David Galvin
4
,
Ola Bratt
5
,
Sigrid Carlsson
6
5
7
,
James Wf Catto
8
,
Agne Krilaviciute
9
,
Michael Philbin
10
,
Peter Albers
9
11
Affiliations
1
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA vickersa@mskcc.org.
2
Department of Urology, Cork University Hospital, Ireland.
3
University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Italy.
4
Department of Surgery, University College Dublin, Ireland.
5
Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
6
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
7
Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
8
Academic Urology Unit, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, UK.
9
Division of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
10
Patient and patient advocate, New York, USA.
11
Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany.
PMID:
37197772
DOI:
10.1136/bmj-2022-071082
No abstract available
MeSH terms
Early Detection of Cancer
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Medical Overuse
Overdiagnosis*
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Prostatic Neoplasms* / diagnosis
Prostatic Neoplasms* / epidemiology
Substances
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Grants and funding
K22 CA234400/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
P30 CA008748/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States