Evaluation of Classification Systems and Their Correlation With Clinical and Quality-of-life Parameters in Patients With Surgically Treated Spondylodiskitis

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical classifications for spondylodiscitis (SD) typically include radiologic features and the status of neurologic impairment. Clinical factors such as preoperative pain, function/disability, overall quality of life (QoL), and risk of recurrence and mortality, which are necessary for a comprehensive assessment of SD and measurement of treatment success, are not considered. There is a lack of external validation of SD classifications. The aim of this study was to validate classifications of SD and to correlate these classifications with the above clinical factors.

Methods: One hundred fourteen patients from a prospective SD register (2008-2020) with available imaging, preoperative neurologic status, backpain, function/disability data (Oswestry Disability Index and Core Outcome Measures Index), QoL data (Short Form 36, European Quality-of-life Questionnaire), and a 1-year follow-up were retrospectively classified according to Akbar, Homagk, and Pola classifications. Interrater reliability, correlation among classifications, and correlation between classifications and QoL were calculated.

Results: Interrater reliability was κ = 0.83 for Akbar, κ = 0.94 for Homagk, and κ = 0.99 for Pola. The correlation of Akbar with Pola and Homagk was moderate (ρ s = 0.47; ρ s = 0.46) and high between Pola and Homagk (ρ s = 0.7). No notable correlation was observed between any of the classifications and preoperative Oswestry Disability Index, Core Outcome Measures Index, QoL, mortality, and recurrence within 1 year. Only a weak correlation was observed between Homagk and preoperative leg pain and back pain.

Conclusion: Available SD classifications have a very good interrater reliability and moderate-to-high correlation with each other but lack correlation with preoperative pain, function/disability, and overall QoL. Because these factors are important for a comprehensive assessment of SD in severity, decision making, and prognosis, they should be included in future SD classifications. This could allow for more comprehensive treatment algorithms.

Level of evidence: Level II. Diagnostic study = prospective cohort study; development of diagnostic criteria.

Data availability: The data sets used and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.