Lessons from other fields of medicine, Part 1: Breast cancer

Handb Clin Neurol. 2023:192:101-118. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-85538-9.00003-1.

Abstract

Through the understanding of multiple etiologies, pathologies, and disease progression trajectories, breast cancer shifted historically from a singular malignancy of the breast to a complex of molecular/biological entities, translating into individualized disease-modifying treatments. As a result, this led to various de-escalations of treatment compared with the gold standard in the era preceding systems biology: radical mastectomy. Targeted therapies have minimized morbidity from the treatments and mortality from the disease. Biomarkers further individualized tumor genetics and molecular biology to optimize treatments targeting specific cancer cells. Landmark discoveries in breast cancer management have evolved through histology, hormone receptors, human epidermal growth factor, single-gene prognostic markers, and multigene prognostic markers. Relevant to the reliance on histopathology in neurodegenerative disorders, histopathology evaluation in breast cancer can serve as a marker of overall prognosis rather than predict response to therapies. This chapter reviews the successes and failures of breast cancer research through history, with focus on the transition from a universal approach for all patients to divergent biomarker development and individualized targeted therapies, discussing future areas of growth in the field that may apply to neurodegenerative disorders.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Breast cancer; Breast surgical oncology; Individualization; Intrinsic subtypes; Mutigene; Oncology; Personalization; Prognostic markers; Targeted therapy.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Breast Neoplasms* / genetics
  • Breast Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mastectomy
  • Prognosis

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor