Balancing the risks and benefits of anesthetics in status epilepticus

Abstract

Purpose: According to international guidelines, status epilepticus refractory to first- and second-line antiseizure medication should be treated with anesthetics. Therefore, continuously delivered intravenous midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates are recommended as third-line therapy. While electroencephalographically (EEG)-controlled titration of anesthetics to seizure termination or to the emergence of an EEG burst-suppression pattern makes sense, evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of such third-line treatment is limited and concerns regarding the risks of anesthesia remain. The lack of treatment alternatives and persistent international discord reflecting contradictory results from some studies leave clinicians on their own when deciding to escalate treatment. In this conference-accompanying narrative review, we highlight the challenges of EEG-monitored third-line treatment and discuss recent studies that examined earlier administration of anesthetics.

Results: Based on the literature, maintaining continuous burst suppression is difficult despite the constant administration of anesthetics, and the evidence for burst suppression as an adequate surrogate target is limited by methodological shortcomings as acknowledged by international guidelines. In our Swiss cohort including 102 patients with refractory status epilepticus, burst suppression as defined by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Critical Care EEG Terminology 2021 was established in only 21%. Besides case reports suggesting that rapid but short-termed anesthesia can be sufficient to permanently stop seizures, a study including 205 patients revealed that anesthesia as second-line treatment was associated with a shorter median duration of status epilepticus (0.5 versus 12.5 days, p < 0.001), median ICU (2 versus 5.5 days, p < 0.001) and hospital stay (8 versus 17 days, p < 0.001) with equal rates of complications when compared to anesthesia as third-line treatment.

Conclusions: Recent investigations have led to important findings and new insights regarding the use of anesthetics in refractory status epilepticus. However, numerous methodological limitations and remaining questions need to be considered when it comes to the translation into clinical practice, and, in consequence, call for prospective randomized studies. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Keywords: Adverse effects; Intravenous anesthetic drugs; Neurocritical care; Status epilepticus; Treatment refractory status epilepticus.