Introduction: This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of acupuncture, intravenous lidocaine, and diet compared with other comparators such as physiotherapy and sham/placebo in fibromyalgia patients. Materials and Methods: We searched Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant studies till September 2021. The included studies were randomized controlled clinical trials. For the network meta-analysis, we used the R software. Results: There were 23 included RCTs. The total sample size was 1409 patients. Compared with the sham/placebo group, the network analysis showed the highest improvement in the quality of life in the acupuncture group standardized mean difference (SMD) = -10.28, 95%-CI [-14.96; -5.59]), and then in the physiotherapy group (SMD = -7.48, 95%-CI [-14.72; -0.23]). For the pain, there was a significant reduction with acupuncture (SMD = -1.69, 95%-CI [-2.48; -0.89]), compared with sham/placebo. Regarding depression, it showed a significant reduction with acupuncture (SMD = -9.64, 95%-CI [-16.13; -3.14]) compared with sham/placebo. Finally, for stiffness, it showed no significant differences in the stiffness between acupuncture (SMD = -8.52, 95%-CI [-20.40; 3.36]), fluoxetine (SMD = -6.52, 95%-CI [-29.65; 16.61]), and physiotherapy (SMD = -4.64, 95%-CI [-22.83; 13.54]) compared with sham/placebo. Conclusions: The acupuncture showed a significant effect in the management of fibromyalgia patients. It reduced pain, depression, and enhanced the quality of life. While physiotherapy showed a significant improvement in the quality of life only. In contrast, intravenous lidocaine and diet showed no significant differences when compared with sham/placebo.
Keywords: acupuncture; diet; fibromyalgia; lidocaine; network meta-analysis.