The country as a whole has been on high alert since early 2020. That year began with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, then moved through the largest single day drop of the Dow Jones industrial average, the murders of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd and subsequent Black Lives Matter protests, murder hornets, the election of Joe Biden, alleged voter fraud, and then culminated on January 6, 2021, with the assault on the United States Capital Building. Societal issues including racism, discrimination, and distrust of leaders have been themes in the news and social media. It should come as no surprise that we may be called upon to provide treatment to patients with whom we have significantly different belief systems, which could result in conflict. The emotional rawness that pervades much of society lays emotions bare for many. Our ethical responsibilities as healthcare providers compel us to think about these complex relationships intentionally, and with compassion. In an interactive workshop conducted at the 42nd Forum for Behavioral Science in Family Medicine, participants were led through scenarios in which conflict could enter the exam room, discussion of the potential consequences, and consideration of ways to respond ethically in those situations. The discussions were couched in the codes of ethics of the American Psychological Association, the National Association of Social Workers, and the American Medical Association. The interactive session was designed to encourage participants to (1) consider potentialities of patient-provider conflict, (2) consider ethical, compassionate responses, and (3) be mindful of social media.
Keywords: Bias; case studies; curriculum; ethics; politics.