Response to: Correspondence on "Nickels and tines: the myth of nickel allergy in intracranial stents" by Apostolos
et al
J Neurointerv Surg
.
2022 Dec;14(12):1287-1288.
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018859.
Epub 2022 Mar 2.
Authors
Michael R Levitt
1
2
3
,
Kevin N Vanent
4
,
Emma M Federico
4
5
,
David I Bass
4
,
Guilherme Barros
4
,
Jade Keen
4
5
Affiliations
1
Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA mlevitt@neurosurgery.washington.edu.
2
Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
3
Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
4
Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
5
Stroke & Applied Neuroscience Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
PMID:
35236769
DOI:
10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018859
No abstract available
Keywords:
aneurysm; complication; device; inflammatory response; stent.
Publication types
Letter
Comment
MeSH terms
Humans
Hypersensitivity*
Intracranial Aneurysm*
Nickel / adverse effects
Stents / adverse effects
Substances
Nickel