Clinical and radiographic outcomes after total hip arthroplasty with the NANOS neck preserving hip stem: a 10 to 16-year follow-up study

Vincenzo De Santis; Nadia Bonfiglio; Mattia Basilico; Greta Tanzi Germani; Maria Rosaria Matrangolo; Angelo Carosini; Giuseppe Malerba; Giulio Maccauro

doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04953-8

Clinical and radiographic outcomes after total hip arthroplasty with the NANOS neck preserving hip stem: a 10 to 16-year follow-up study

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 10;22(Suppl 2):1061. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04953-8.

Authors

Vincenzo De Santis^{1

2}, Nadia Bonfiglio^{2

3}, Mattia Basilico^{2

3}, Greta Tanzi Germani², Maria Rosaria Matrangolo^{2

3}, Angelo Carosini^{2

3}, Giuseppe Malerba⁴, Giulio Maccauro^{2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedics, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy.
² Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
³ Department of Orthopaedics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, RM, Italy.
⁴ Department of Orthopaedics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, RM, Italy. drgmalerba@gmail.com.

Abstract

Background: Short-stem Hip Arthroplasty (SHA) are increasingly implanted in recent years thanks to their potential advantage in preserving metaphyseal bone-stock. Among them, the NANOS® short-stem implant demonstrated satisfactory results to short and mid-term. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome of the Nanos® short stem at a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

Methods: Sixty-seven patients aged 53 ± 20 years were enlisted in the study, for a total of 72 hips. Primary outcomes were survivorship of the implant and clinical outcome measured using the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome scores (HOOS) and the Short Form Survey (SF12) questionnaire. The secondary outcome was a radiological evaluation calculating the inclination and the anteversion angle of the acetabular cup for each implant and investigating osteolysis, heterotopic ossifications and stem position.

Results: We observed a 95.5% stem survivorship. The complication rate was 7.6% and three implants underwent revision because of an aseptic loosening, an infection and a periprosthetic fracture due to trauma. Among 58 patients (63 hips) evaluated in an outpatient visit 10-16 years after surgery, improvement in clinically relevant scores comparing with baseline was observed: HOOS score increased after surgery in all its subcategories (from 32.25 ± 14.07% up to 91.91 ± 9.13%) as well as SF12 which increased by more than 18 percentage points. On clinical assessment, the range of motion (ROM) was restored at follow-up, 1 patient (1.7%) showed a squeaking hip and 2 (3.4%) reported leg-length discrepancy. Neutral stem positioning was achieved in 58 hips and heterotopic ossifications occurred in 10 hips (16%).

Conclusions: The current study reports good clinical and radiological outcomes following NANOS® short-stem hip implant at minimum 10 years-follow-up. Since the high rate of stem survivorship, the low complication rate demonstrated and the overall patient satisfaction, our results suggest NANOS® neck-preserving prostheses should be considered as a valid alternative to standard implants.

Keywords: Outcome; Short stem hip arthroplasty; Survivorship; Total hip arthroplasty.

MeSH terms

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip*
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Prosthesis*
Humans
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome