Repair versus Debridement for Acetabular Labral Tears-A Systematic Review

Eoghan T Hurley; Andrew J Hughes; M Shazil Jamal; Edward S Mojica; David A Bloom; Thomas Youm; Tom McCarthy

doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.008

Repair versus Debridement for Acetabular Labral Tears-A Systematic Review

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 18;3(5):e1569-e1576. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.008. eCollection 2021 Oct.

Authors

Eoghan T Hurley^{1

2}, Andrew J Hughes², M Shazil Jamal², Edward S Mojica¹, David A Bloom¹, Thomas Youm¹, Tom McCarthy²

Affiliations

¹ New York University Langone Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
² Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the evidence in the literature to ascertain whether acetabular labral repair (ALR) or debridement (ALD) resulted in superior patient outcomes.

Methods: The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies comparing ALR and ALD published in English with full text available were included. Patients undergoing both open and arthroscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies were included. Studies were quantified for methodological quality using the MINORS criteria. Clinical outcomes were compared, with qualitative analysis, and quantitative analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 7. A P value <.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results: There were 8 studies included (level of evidence [LOE] I = 1; LOE II = 2; LOE III = 5). The 7 studies compared 364 patients (369 hips) with ALR to 318 patients (329 hips) with ALD, with a mean follow-up time ranging between 32-120 months. Five studies found significantly improved patient reported outcomes with ALR (Harris Hip Score, Merle d'Aubigné, Pain, SF-12). Several studies compared the outcomes after ALR and ALD and found statistical significance in all investigated metrics in favor of ALR. One study found a significant improvement in abduction but no other study found any difference in range of motion. No study found any difference in complication rate, revision rate or conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Although, 2 studies found ALR reduced the rate of osteoarthritic progression.

Conclusion: Current literature suggests that acetabular labral repair may result in superior patient reported outcomes. However, there appears to be no significant difference in the rate of progression to total hip arthroplasty at up to 10-year follow-up.

Level of evidence: Level III, systematic review of Level I, II, and III studies.

Publication types

Review