Laparoscopic versus Open Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right Colon Cancer

Int J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb 2:2021:8859879. doi: 10.1155/2021/8859879. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Results: The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LCME group than that in the OCME group with less mean intraoperative blood loss. Conversion was required in 4 patients (8.3%) in the LCME group. The use of laparoscopy increased the number of harvested lymph nodes compared to the open approach (39.81 ± 16.74 vs. 32.65 ± 12.28, respectively, P=0.010). The laparoscopic approach was associated with a shorter time interval to first flatus as well as shorter time interval to liquid and normal diet after surgery. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LCME group. The complication rate was slightly lower in the LCME (14.7%) than in the OCME group (27.2%) (P=0.252). The 3-year OS in the LCME group was similar to that in OCME (78.2% vs. 63.2%, respectively, P value = 0.423). The three-year DFS in the laparoscopic group was higher (74.5%) than the open group (60.0%), but did not reach statistical significance (P value = 0.266).

Conclusions: In conclusion, laparoscopic CME right hemicolectomy is a technically feasible and safe procedure if surgeon expertise is present. LCME has long-term oncologic outcomes (recurrence and survival) comparable to open surgery for management of patients with stage II or III colon cancer.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Blood Loss, Surgical
  • Colectomy / methods*
  • Colon, Ascending / surgery
  • Colon, Transverse / surgery
  • Colonic Neoplasms / pathology
  • Colonic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Conversion to Open Surgery
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Length of Stay
  • Lymph Node Excision
  • Lymph Nodes / pathology
  • Lymph Nodes / surgery
  • Male
  • Mesocolon / surgery*
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Operative Time
  • Recovery of Function
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome