Emulsion polymerase chain reaction (ePCR) enables parallel amplification of millions of different DNA molecules while avoiding bias and chimeric byproducts, essential criteria for applications including next generation sequencing, aptamer selection, and protein-DNA interaction studies. Despite these advantages, ePCR remains underused due to the lack of optimal starting conditions, straightforward methods to evaluate success, and guidelines for tuning the reaction. This knowledge has been elusive for bulk emulsion generation methods, such as stirring and vortexing, the only methods that can emulsify libraries of ≥108 sequences within minutes, because these emulsions have not been characterized in ways that preserve the heterogeneity that defines successful ePCR. Our study quantifies the outcome of ePCR from conditions specified in the literature using single particle analysis, which preserves this heterogeneity. We combine ePCR with magnetic microbeads and quantify the amplification yield via qPCR and the proportion of clonal and saturated beads via flow cytometry. Our single particle level analysis of thousands of beads resolves two key criteria that define the success of ePCR: 1) whether the target fraction of 20% clonal beads predicted by the Poisson distribution is achieved, and 2) whether those beads are partially or maximally covered by amplified DNA. We found that among the two concentrations of polymerase tested, only the higher one, which is 20-fold more than the concentration recommended for conventional PCR, could yield sufficient PCR products. Dramatic increases in the concentrations of reverse primer and nucleotides recommended in literature gave no measurable change in outcome. We thus provide evidence-based starting conditions for effective and economical ePCR for real DNA libraries and a straightforward workflow for evaluating the success of tuning ePCR prior to downstream applications.
Keywords: DNA beads; DNA library Amplification; Emulsion PCR; Flow cytometry; Magnetic beads; Poisson.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.