The effectiveness, risks and improvement of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy during the learning curve: a propensity score-matched analysis

Long Huang; Yifeng Tian; Jiayi Wu; Maolin Yan; Funan Qiu; Songqiang Zhou; Yannan Bai; Zhide Lai; Yaodong Wang; Shi Chen

doi:10.21037/gs-20-98

The effectiveness, risks and improvement of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy during the learning curve: a propensity score-matched analysis

Gland Surg. 2020 Aug;9(4):985-999. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-98.

Authors

Long Huang^{1

2}, Yifeng Tian^{1

2}, Jiayi Wu^{1

2}, Maolin Yan^{1

2}, Funan Qiu^{1

2}, Songqiang Zhou^{1

2}, Yannan Bai^{1

2}, Zhide Lai^{1

2}, Yaodong Wang^{1

2}, Shi Chen^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
² Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Abstract

Background: Propensity score-matched analyses comparing the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) that consider the effect of the learning curve for LPD are lacking. We use Propensity score-matched to compare the safety and efficacy of LPD during the learning curve to OPD.

Methods: The medical records of 296 consecutive patients who had undergone LPD or OPD between September 2016 and August 2019 at Fujian Provincial Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Patients treated with LPD were matched 1:1 to those treated with OPD. Calculation of propensity scores considered age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, pathology, incidence of obstructive jaundice, incidence of biliary drainage, pancreatic texture, pancreatic duct diameter, previous abdominal surgery, comorbidities, and case distribution of the surgical team.

Results: After propensity score matching, 196 patients were divided into two groups: 98 patients in the LPD group and 98 patients in the OPD group. LPD performed during the learning curve was associated with a longer median operative time (OT) (432 vs. 328 min, P<0.001), a higher incidence of major surgery-associated complications (32.7% vs. 14.3%, P=0.002), a higher incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (27.6% vs. 13.3%, P=0.013), and prolonged LOS (21.06 d vs. 16.94 d, P=0.033), but lower median intraoperative blood loss (200 vs. 300 mL, P<0.001) compared to OPD. Mean OT and LOS were significantly shorter in the late phase of the learning curve for LPD (P<0.001), and were similar to that for OPD. Age >60 years and a non-dilated MPD were significant predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula, major surgery-associated complications, prolonged LOS and postoperative mortality at 90 days (all P<0.05).

Conclusions: OT, incidence of major surgery-associated complications, and LOS were significantly increased in patients that underwent LPD, but were significantly improved during the learning curve. Elderly patients and patients with a non-dialated MPD should not be treated with LPD performed by inexperienced surgeons.

Keywords: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD); efficacy; learning curve; open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD); safety profile.