Immune Response Evaluation and Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Beyond Clinical Progression: Response Assessments for Cancer Immunotherapy

Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 Aug 27;22(11):116. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-00974-z.

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review provides a comprehensive assessment of recent literature reports describing atypical response patterns observed with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), modifications to response evaluation criteria for ICIs, and treatment beyond progression in clinical trials.

Recent findings: Certain response patterns such as durable response, pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, and dissociated responses can be seen with ICI treatment. These patterns carry differing prognoses and are associated with varied factors. There are multiple modifications of standard Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) that have been proposed to better characterize immunotherapy response; however, standard RECIST1.1 remains most commonly used in clinical trials. Treatment beyond progression varies in frequency and benefit depending on assessment criteria and cancer type. Future research incorporating modified imaging criteria and biomarker assessments may serve to clarify who will benefit most from treatment beyond progression.

Keywords: Atypical response patterns; Immunotherapy; RECIST; Response criteria; Solid tumors; Treatment beyond progression.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Disease Progression
  • Humans
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Immunotherapy*
  • Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Prognosis
  • Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors