Purpose of review: To examine the utility and methods of coronary artery disease (CAD) assessment in patients with new-onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) of unclear etiology. Moreover, we sought to review the role and techniques of assessing myocardial viability to guide coronary revascularization in patients with established ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Recent findings: Data indicates that surgical coronary revascularization in patients with HFrEF due to ischemic cardiomyopathy leads to lower long-term all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Thus, identifying ischemic heart disease in patients with new-onset HFrEF is essential. In addition to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging, coronary CT angiography (CCTA), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging have emerged as effective non-invasive tools in the assessment of CAD in this population. Viability testing remains an area of particular interest and debate and its full potential has not been fully addressed. We propose stepwise algorithms for CAD and viability assessment in this patient population. Non-invasive testing with radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging, CCTA, and CMR is an alternative to ICA for CAD assessment in patients with new-onset HFrEF of unclear etiology. Several non-invasive imaging modalities have proved to be effective in detecting viable myocardium in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The use of viability imaging to guide coronary revascularization should be individualized.
Keywords: Coronary artery disease (CAD); Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); Ischemia; Ischemic cardiomyopathy; Viability.