Direct, Competitive Comparison of Linear, Monocyclic, and Bicyclic Libraries Using mRNA Display

ACS Comb Sci. 2020 Jun 8;22(6):306-310. doi: 10.1021/acscombsci.0c00016. Epub 2020 May 17.

Abstract

Peptide macrocyclization is typically associated with the development of higher affinity and more protease stable protein ligands, and, as such, is an important tool in peptide drug discovery. Yet, within the context of a diverse library, does cyclization give inherent advantages over linear peptides? Here, we used mRNA display to create a peptide library of diverse ring sizes and topologies (monocyclic, bicyclic, and linear). Several rounds of in vitro selection against streptavidin were performed and the winning peptide sequences were analyzed for their binding affinities and overall topologies. The effect of adding a protease challenge on the enrichment of various peptides was also investigated. Taken together, the selection output yields insights about the relative abundance of binders of various topologies within a structurally diverse library.

Keywords: binding affinity; in vitro selection; mRNA display; peptide cyclization; peptide library.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Amino Acid Sequence
  • Drug Discovery
  • Peptide Library*
  • Peptides / chemistry*
  • Peptides / pharmacology
  • RNA, Messenger*

Substances

  • Peptide Library
  • Peptides
  • RNA, Messenger