Conventional approaches to the treatment of early-stage lung cancer have focused on the use of surgical methods to remove the tumor. Recent progress in radiation therapy techniques and in the field of interventional oncology has seen the development of several novel ablative therapies that have gained widespread acceptance as alternatives to conventional surgical options in appropriately selected patients. Local control rates with stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage lung cancer now approach those of surgical resection, while percutaneous ablation is in widespread use for the treatment of lung cancer and oligometastatic disease for selected other malignancies. Tumors treated with targeted medical and ablative therapies can respond to treatment differently when compared with conventional therapies. For example, after stereotactic body radiation therapy, radiologic patterns of posttreatment change can mimic disease progression, and, following percutaneous ablation, the expected initial increase in the size of a treated lesion limits the utility of conventional size-based response assessment criteria. In addition, numerous treatment-related side effects have been described that are important to recognize, both to ensure appropriate treatment and to avoid misclassification as worsening tumor. Imaging plays a vital role in the assessment of patients receiving targeted ablative therapy, and it is essential that thoracic radiologists become familiar with these findings.