The Munduruku marmoset: a new monkey species from southern Amazonia

PeerJ. 2019 Jul 25:7:e7019. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7019. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Although the Atlantic Forest marmosets (Callithrix spp.) are among the best studied Neotropical primates, the Amazonian marmosets (Callibella humilis, Cebuella spp. and Mico spp.) are much less well-known. Even species diversity and distributions are yet to be properly determined because field data and materials currently available in scientific collections do not allow comprehensive taxonomic studies of Amazonian marmosets. From 2015 to 2018, we conducted 10 expeditions in key-areas within southern Amazonia where little or no information on marmosets was available. In one such region-the Tapajós-Jamanxim interfluve-we recorded marmosets with a distinctive pelage pigmentation pattern suggesting they could represent a new species. We tested this hypothesis using an integrative taxonomic framework that included phylogenomic data (ddRAD sequences), pelage pigmentation characters, and distribution records. We found that the marmosets of the northern Tapajós-Jamanxim interfluve have unique states in pelage pigmentation characters, form a clade (100% support) in our Bayesian and Maximum-Likelihood phylogenies, and occur in an area isolated from other taxa by rivers. The integration of these lines of evidence leads us to describe a new marmoset species in the genus Mico, named after the Munduruku Amerindians of the Tapajós-Jamanxim interfluve, southwest of Pará State, Brazil.

Keywords: Arc of deforestation; Field exploration; Integrative taxonomy; Jamanxim River; Species discovery; Tapajós River.

Grants and funding

Rodrigo Costa Araújo was supported by CNPq (140039/2018-1), CAPES and FAPEAM provided a PhD scholarship, Conservation Leadership Programme (F02304217), Conservation International’s Margot Marsh Primate Action Fund (6002856) for funding fieldwork, and CAPES/PRO-AMAZONIA/AUXPE (3261/2013) for funding fieldwork and labwork, to NSF/FAPESP “Dimensions of Biodiversity” (NSF 1241066 and FAPESP 12/50260-6) for funding laboratory work, and to Idea Wild. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.