Scalable methods for analyzing and visualizing phylogenetic placement of metagenomic samples

PLoS One. 2019 May 28;14(5):e0217050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217050. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background: The exponential decrease in molecular sequencing cost generates unprecedented amounts of data. Hence, scalable methods to analyze these data are required. Phylogenetic (or Evolutionary) Placement methods identify the evolutionary provenance of anonymous sequences with respect to a given reference phylogeny. This increasingly popular method is deployed for scrutinizing metagenomic samples from environments such as water, soil, or the human gut.

Novel methods: Here, we present novel and, more importantly, highly scalable methods for analyzing phylogenetic placements of metagenomic samples. More specifically, we introduce methods for (a) visualizing differences between samples and their correlation with associated meta-data on the reference phylogeny, (b) clustering similar samples using a variant of the k-means method, and (c) finding phylogenetic factors using an adaptation of the Phylofactorization method. These methods enable to interpret metagenomic data in a phylogenetic context, to find patterns in the data, and to identify branches of the phylogeny that are driving these patterns.

Results: To demonstrate the scalability and utility of our methods, as well as to provide exemplary interpretations of our methods, we applied them to 3 publicly available datasets comprising 9782 samples with a total of approximately 168 million sequences. The results indicate that new biological insights can be attained via our methods.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Animals
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Computational Biology
  • Computers
  • Databases, Genetic
  • Diatoms / classification
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Microbiome / genetics*
  • Geography
  • Humans
  • Metagenome*
  • Metagenomics / methods*
  • Oceans and Seas*
  • Phylogeny*
  • Software
  • Vaginosis, Bacterial / microbiology*

Grants and funding

This work was financially supported by the Klaus Tschira Stiftung gGmbH (https://www.klaus-tschira-stiftung.de) in Heidelberg, Germany. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.